ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2025
Protein Biosynthesis and Carbon Catabolite Repression Are Transcriptionally Upregulated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by Extracellular Fractions From Several Wine Yeast Species.
Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selective DNA encapsulation in extracellular vesicles ofExtracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2026Article
- Evaluation of compartmentalization systems to study microbial interactions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Investigating the transcriptional fingerprints of coculturedFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-Saccharomyces yeast species are increasingly used in winemaking in combination with Saccharomyces cerevisiae to modulate sensory attributes or as processing aids. Consequently, there is academic and practical interest in understanding how different yeast species interact with each other in grape must. Although interactions will depend on the metabolic capabilities of the strains involved, there are other possible interaction mechanisms between wine yeasts. In this work we used extracellular vesicle (EV)-enriched fractions from different non-Saccharomyces species to challenge S. cerevisiae inoculated in synthetic grape must. The results show that the previously described response to EVs of Metschnikowia pulcherrima was not an isolated phenomenon, but that S. cerevisiae responds in a general way to EVs of other yeast species. Meta-analysis of the results points to protein biosynthesis and carbon catabolite repression as general targets; both being stimulated by the interaction, beyond the acclimatisation to the synthetic juice experienced by the control cells. The intensity of the response showed differences between the four species; while the transcriptional response to M. pulcherrima EVs clearly diverges from that to EVs of the other yeast species, which show greater similarity to each other.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.