ReviewAudiology research2025
Vestibular Atelectasis: A Narrative Review and Our Experience.
Review in Audiology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vestibular atelectasis (VA) is a rare clinical entity characterized by a collapse of the endolymphatic space resulting in vestibular loss with the possible onset of positional and/or sound/pressure-induced vertigo. It could be idiopathic or secondary to other inner-ear diseases including Meniere's disease (MD). A collapse of the membranous labyrinth involving the semicircular canals (SCs) and the utricle represents its distinctive histopathological feature. While specific radiological patterns consistent with VA have been described on contrast-enhanced MRI with delayed acquisitions, an impairment of the blood-labyrinthine barrier (BLB) could be detected in several disorders leading to vestibular loss. We conducted a narrative review of the literature on VA focusing on the putative pathomechanisms accounting for positional and sound/pressure-induced nystagmus despite unilateral vestibular loss (UVL) in this condition, providing two novel cases of VA. Both patients presented with a clinical picture consistent with unilateral MD that rapidly turned into progressive UVL and positional and/or sound/pressure-induced vertigo. In both cases, the posterior SC was initially impaired at the video-head impulse test (vHIT) and both cervical and ocular VEMPs were initially reduced. Progressively, they developed unsteadiness with paretic spontaneous nystagmus, an impairment also for the lateral and anterior SCs, caloric hypo/areflexia and VEMPs areflexia. They both exhibited ipsilesional nystagmus to sound/pressure stimuli and in one case a persistent geotropic direction-changing positional nystagmus consistent with a "light cupula" mechanism involving the lateral SC of the affected side. A collapse of the membranous labyrinthine walls resulting in contact between the vestibular sensors and the stapes footplate could explain the onset of nystagmus to loud sounds and/or pressure changes despite no responses to high- and low-frequency inputs as detected by caloric irrigations, vHIT and VEMPs. On the other hand, the onset of positional nystagmus despite UVL could be explained with the theory of the "floating labyrinth". Both patients received contrast-enhanced brain MRI with delayed acquisition exhibiting increased contrast uptake in the pars superior of the labyrinth, suggesting an impairment of the BLB likely resulting in secondary VA. A small intralabyrinthine schwannoma was detected in one case. VA should always be considered in case of positional and/or sound/pressure-induced vertigo despite UVL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.