Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40407527›Full record

ReviewJournal of xenobiotics2025

Innovative Approaches and Evolving Strategies in Heavy Metal Bioremediation: Current Limitations and Future Opportunities.

Cristina Firincă, Lucian-Gabriel Zamfir, Mariana Constantin, Iuliana Răut, Maria-Luiza Jecu, Mihaela Doni, Ana-Maria Gurban, Tatiana Eugenia Șesan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of xenobiotics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. PRISMA-based review ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cristina FirincăBiotechnology Department, National Institute for Research & Development in Chemistry and Petrochemistry-ICECHIM, 202 Spl. Independenței, 060021 Bucharest, Romania.
Lucian-Gabriel ZamfirBiotechnology Department, National Institute for Research & Development in Chemistry and Petrochemistry-ICECHIM, 202 Spl. Independenței, 060021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-8967-425X
Mariana ConstantinBiotechnology Department, National Institute for Research & Development in Chemistry and Petrochemistry-ICECHIM, 202 Spl. Independenței, 060021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7600-2980
Iuliana RăutBiotechnology Department, National Institute for Research & Development in Chemistry and Petrochemistry-ICECHIM, 202 Spl. Independenței, 060021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6178-1651
Maria-Luiza JecuBiotechnology Department, National Institute for Research & Development in Chemistry and Petrochemistry-ICECHIM, 202 Spl. Independenței, 060021 Bucharest, Romania.
Mihaela DoniBiotechnology Department, National Institute for Research & Development in Chemistry and Petrochemistry-ICECHIM, 202 Spl. Independenței, 060021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8434-0261
Ana-Maria GurbanBiotechnology Department, National Institute for Research & Development in Chemistry and Petrochemistry-ICECHIM, 202 Spl. Independenței, 060021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2059-7065
Tatiana Eugenia ȘesanDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, 91-95 Spl. Independenței, 050095 Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

Ministerul Cercetării și Inovării PN 23.06.01.01-AQUAMAT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decades of technological advancements have led to major environmental concerns, particularly the bioaccumulation of heavy metals, which pose persistent risks to ecosystems and human health. Consequently, research has increasingly shifted from conventional remediation techniques toward more sustainable, environmentally friendly solutions. This review explores recent advancements, ongoing challenges, and future perspectives in the field of bioremediation, emphasizing its potential as a green technology for heavy metal decontamination. Despite significant progress, key challenges remain, including scalability limitations and the management of bioremediation by-products, along with the influence of regulatory policies and public perception on its large-scale implementation. Emerging approaches such as genetic engineering and nanotechnology show promise in overcoming these limitations. Gene editing allows the tailoring of specific metabolic traits for bioprocesses targeted towards increased tolerance to pollutants and higher biodegradation efficiency, higher enzymatic specificity and affinity, and improved yield and fitness in plants. Nanotechnologies, particularly biogenic nanostructures, open up the possibility of repurposing waste materials as well as harnessing the advantages of the biosynthesis of NPs with higher stability, biocompatibility, and biostimulant capacities. Furthermore, biopolymers and bio-based nanocomposites can improve the efficiency and costs of bioremediation protocols. Even so, further research is essential to evaluate their long-term risks and feasibility.

Indexed as

bioremediationgenetic engineeringheavy metalsnanotechnology

Identifiers

PMID40407527
PMCPMC12101164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.