Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40407523›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2025

Participatory Workflow Analysis of Newborn Genetic Screening (NBS) to Support Tools for Improved Follow-Up: Comparing the Use Case of Hemoglobinopathy Traits Across U.S. States.

Peter Taber, Jennifer Baysinger, Sierra Daniels, Natalie Diaz-Kincaid, Amy Gaviglio, Jacob Ginter, Patrice K Held, Emily Reeves, Virginia Sack, Jennifer Weaver and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Peter TaberDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1120-5971
Jennifer BaysingerOklahoma Department of Health, Oklahoma City, OK 73102, USA.
Sierra DanielsIowa Newborn Screening Program, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Natalie Diaz-KincaidNewborn Screening Program, Division of Disease Control & Health Statistics, Washington State Department of Health, Shoreline, WA 98155, USA.
Amy GaviglioConnetics Consulting, LLC, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7598-3820
Jacob GinterIowa Newborn Screening Program, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8481-3559
Patrice K HeldOregon State Public Health Laboratory, Oregon Health Authority, Hillsboro, OR 97124, USA.
Emily ReevesFlorida Newborn Screening Follow-Up Program, Division of Children's Medical Services, Tallahassee, FL 32399, USA.
Virginia SackNewborn Screening Program, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12237, USA.
Jennifer WeaverMaternal and Child Health Division, Indiana Department of Health, Indianapolis, IN 46204, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-6861-107X
Karen EilbeckDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84115, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communication of newborn screening (NBS) results often fails to provide clear explanations of NBS screen results to parents. Understanding existing NBS workflows is vital for improving NBS follow-up. We sought to describe a diverse range of state NBS programs as a starting point for designing tools to improve NBS follow-up, using the example of hemoglobinopathy traits. At a workshop of the 2023 Association of Public Health Laboratories NBS Symposium, participants filled out a survey and modeled their state workflows. Salient features were extracted and synthesized by state. A subset of models was member checked. Representatives from 19 U.S. states participated in the workflow analysis. Mail was overwhelmingly relied upon to convey the results. NBS programs differed by point of first contact with parents and degree of reliance on third parties. A participatory approach is useful for the rapid preliminary documentation of existing NBS program diversity and opportunities and challenges to improve patient education and follow-up. Future work should broaden the analysis to additional entities or individuals, particularly parents and caregivers.

Indexed as

hemoglobinopathyinformaticsnewborn screeningparticipatory designworkflow analysis

Identifiers

PMID40407523
PMCPMC12101280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.