Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40407515›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2025

An Explorative Qualitative Study of the Role of a Genetic Counsellor to Parents Receiving a Diagnosis After a Positive Newborn Bloodspot Screening.

Samantha A Sandelowsky, Alison McEwen, Jacqui Russell, Kirsten Boggs, Rosie Junek, Carolyn Ellaway, Arthavan Selvanathan, Michelle A Farrar, Kaustuv Bhattacharya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Samantha A SandelowskyGraduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.
Alison McEwenGraduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8705-1190
Jacqui RussellDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
Kirsten BoggsDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
Rosie JunekGenetic Metabolic Disorders Service, Syndey Children's Hospital Network, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.
Carolyn EllawayDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
Arthavan SelvanathanDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
Michelle A FarrarDepartment of Paediatric Neurology, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
Kaustuv BhattacharyaGenetic Metabolic Disorders Service, Syndey Children's Hospital Network, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0518-5879

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newborn Bloodspot Screening (NBS) can detect severe treatable health conditions with onset during infancy. The parents of a newborn baby are vulnerable in the days after birth, and the optimal way to deliver the shocking and distressing news of a potential serious diagnosis is yet to be defined. More data are needed to determine whether access to a genetic counsellor (GC) improves families' experiences with genetic conditions identified by NBS. This study aimed to explore the similarities and differences for parents who received a positive NBS result for Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) and received access to a GC (GC cohort), to a cohort of parents who received a diagnosis for inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) and did not have access to a GC (non-GC cohort). Semi-structured interviews explored the retrospective experiences of receiving the NBS result, including diagnosis implications and subsequent adaptation to respective genetic diagnoses. Inductive thematic analysis was used from group comparison. 7 SMA families and 5 IEM families were included in the study. Four themes were identified: 1. minimal pre-test counselling; 2. perceived lack of local healthcare team knowledge; 3. enabling factors for adaptation; 4. implications for both individuals and their families. Both the GC and non-GC cohorts reported insufficient counselling in the pre-test period and described feeling traumatised at the time of the diagnosis delivery. Families without subsequent GC input described limited understanding of the disease due to the use of medicalized terms, as well as a decreased understanding of reproductive options, familial communication and subsequent cascade screening. GCs can support information needs and adaptation following a NBS diagnosis.

Indexed as

adaptationgenetic counsellorsgeneticsgenomicsinborn errors of metabolismnewborn bloodspot screeningpsychosocial adjustmentspinal muscular atrophy

Identifiers

PMID40407515
PMCPMC12101340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.