Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40407490›Full record

ArticleBiotech (Basel (Switzerland))2025

Comparative Potential of Chitinase and Chitosanase from the Strain

Gleb Aktuganov, Alexander Lobov, Nailya Galimzianova, Elena Gilvanova, Lyudmila Kuzmina, Polina Milman, Alena Ryabova, Alexander Melentiev, Sergey Chetverikov, Sergey Starikov and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gleb AktuganovUfa Institute of Biology, Ufa Federal Research Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, 69, Prospect Oktyabrya, 450054 Ufa, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1379-3671
Alexander LobovUfa Institute of Chemistry, Ufa Federal Research Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, 71, Prospect Oktyabrya, 450054 Ufa, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9223-508X
Nailya GalimzianovaUfa Institute of Biology, Ufa Federal Research Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, 69, Prospect Oktyabrya, 450054 Ufa, Russia.
Elena GilvanovaUfa Institute of Biology, Ufa Federal Research Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, 69, Prospect Oktyabrya, 450054 Ufa, Russia.
Lyudmila KuzminaUfa Institute of Biology, Ufa Federal Research Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, 69, Prospect Oktyabrya, 450054 Ufa, Russia.
Polina MilmanUfa Institute of Biology, Ufa Federal Research Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, 69, Prospect Oktyabrya, 450054 Ufa, Russia.
Alena RyabovaUfa Institute of Biology, Ufa Federal Research Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, 69, Prospect Oktyabrya, 450054 Ufa, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9768-0871
Alexander MelentievUfa Institute of Biology, Ufa Federal Research Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, 69, Prospect Oktyabrya, 450054 Ufa, Russia.
Sergey ChetverikovUfa Institute of Biology, Ufa Federal Research Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, 69, Prospect Oktyabrya, 450054 Ufa, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7961-1503
Sergey StarikovUfa Institute of Biology, Ufa Federal Research Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, 69, Prospect Oktyabrya, 450054 Ufa, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9681-5762
Sergey LopatinInstitute of Bioengineering of Federal Research Center "Fundamentals of Biotechnology" of Russian Academy of Sciences, 7, bld. 1, 60 let Oktyabrya Prospect, 117312 Moscow, Russia.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 075-00326-19-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The depolymerization of chitosan using chitinolytic enzymes is one of the most promising approaches for the production of bioactive soluble chitooligosaccharides (COS) due to its high specificity, environmental safety, mild reaction conditions, and potential for development. However, the comparative efficacy of bacterial chitinases and chitosanases in terms of yield, solubility, and antimicrobial activity of produced COS remains understudied. In this work, chitinase (73 kDa) and chitosanase (40 kDa) from the strain

Indexed as

Bacillus thuringiensischitinasechitooligosaccharideschitosanaseconstitutive enzymesfungicidal activitylow-molecular weight chitosanprotein purification

Identifiers

PMID40407490
PMCPMC12101196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.