ArticleEpigenomes2025
Article in Epigenomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious evidence demonstrated DNA methylation changes in response to stress in plants, showing rapid changes within a limited time frame. Exposure to self-DNA inhibits seedling root elongation, and it was shown that it causes changes in CG DNA methylation in
methodsWe used whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) and RNA-seq analyses to assess genomic cytosine methylation and corresponding gene expression, respectively, on DNA and RNA extracted with commercial kits from roots exposed to self-DNA by an original setup. Fifteen hundred roots replicates, including the control in distilled water, were collected after exposure. Sequencing was performed on a NovaSeq 6000 platform and Ultralow Methyl-Seq System for RNA and DNA WGBS, respectively.
resultsGene expression in roots exposed to self-DNA differed from that of untreated controls, with a total of 305 genes differentially expressed and 87 ontologies enriched in at least one treatment vs. control comparison, and particularly after 24 h of exposure. DNA methylation, particularly in CHG and CHH contexts, was also different, with hyper- and hypomethylation prevailing in treatments vs. controls at 6 h and 24 h, respectively. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) analysis, Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis, and differentially methylated regions (DMRs) analysis, provided an integrated understanding of the changes associated with self-DNA exposure. Our results suggest differential gene expression associated with DNA methylation in response to self-DNA exposure in
conclusionsMain functional indications of association between DNA methylation and gene expression involved hypomethylation and downregulation of genes related to nucleotide/nucleoside metabolism (ATP synthase subunit) and cell wall structure (XyG synthase), consistent with previous observations from metabolomics and physiological studies. Further confirmation of these findings will contribute to improving our understanding of the plant molecular response to self-DNA and its implications in stress responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.