ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Nanogenerator Neuromodulation to Enable Locomotion Rehabilitation for Spinal Cord Injury via Epidural Electrical Stimulation.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research on GM1 bound bMSCs loaded with SF hydrogel for spinal cord injury repair.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Magnetically Responsive Piezoelectric Nanocapacitors Enhance Neural Recovery Following Spinal Cord Injury via Targeted Spinal Magnetic Stimulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Nanogenerator Neuromodulation to Enable Locomotion Rehabilitation for Spinal Cord Injury via Epidural Electrical Stimulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Effects of postoperative electrical stimulation on quadriceps muscular atrophy in patients with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury. A retrospective study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a severe neurological disease, often accompanied by impaired lower limb motor function and muscle atrophy. Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) has been demonstrated promising for SCI therapy in ways of rehabilitation by facilitating the recovery of lower limb motor abilities. However, EES necessitates a considerable consumption of electrical energy and exhibits large individual differences in treatment. Nanogenerators (NGs) based on a novel power generation technology, are capable of transforming mechanical energy into electrical power. This mechanic-driven electrical stimulation has been reported effective in several types of neuromodulations, but not in EES to enable SCI rehabilitation. This study explores the efficacy of a hybrid-NG (H-NG) to elicit hindlimb locomotion in rats via EES on the spinal cord, in comparison with a commercial stimulus generator (SG). The results reveal that H-NG can activate the spinal cord and induce hindlimb locomotion with much lower electrical parameters and much smaller individual differences than SG. In addition, benefiting from the miniature size of the H-NG, an implantable EES system is constructed in vivo, enabling a self-driven and rational-controlled EES pattern. The proposed H-NG-based EES system provides a new strategy for optimized and personalized treatment for SCI patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.