Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40407405›Full record

ReviewEpilepsia2025

Cortico-cortical evoked potentials: Analytical techniques and emerging paradigms for epileptogenic zone localization.

Zekai Qiang, Jamie Norris, Gerald Cooray, Richard Rosch, Kai Miller, Dora Hermes, Aswin Chari, Martin Tisdall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epilepsia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Physics and Physiology of Electrical Stimulation of the Brain.Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zekai QiangDevelopmental Neuroscience, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8271-8507
Jamie NorrisWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.
Gerald CoorayDepartment of Neurophysiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8321-7085
Richard RoschDepartment for Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0316-5818
Kai MillerDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6687-6422
Dora HermesDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Aswin ChariDevelopmental Neuroscience, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0053-147X
Martin TisdallDevelopmental Neuroscience, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) are an active electrophysiological technique used during intracranial electroencephalography to evaluate the effective connectivity and influence of therapeutic stimulation between distinct cortical regions and pinpoint epileptogenic zones (EZs) in patients with epilepsy. Various methodologies have been implemented to analyze CCEPs and characterize the epileptogenic networks for EZ localization. Despite its promise, their interpretation remains challenging due to the large volumes of spatially and temporally complex data generated. Early studies focused largely on qualitative descriptors and predefined, semi-quantitative features such as waveform morphology and peak latencies. However, these methods are limited by the significant heterogeneity in CCEP waveform conformations across patients and cortical regions. The specific technique used for extraction of features, such as the spectral band power and root mean squared values, remains open to empirical refinement, as does choice of appropriate latency windows, with no consensus reached regarding the optimal approach. Graph theoretical metrics such as degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and clustering coefficients can provide a rich representation of epileptogenic network connectivity. However, these metrics are often abstract and difficult to interpret in a clinical setting or to the non-expert, and their neuroscientific substrates remains poorly understood. The lack of standardization in stimulation protocol and data-processing pipelines has further contributed to inconsistency in reported findings. Emerging machine learning approaches have been increasingly applied to CCEP data, offering a more data-driven and potentially generalizable way to identify electrophysiological biomarkers of the epileptogenic effective connectivity. In this article, we discuss qualitative, quantitative, and spectral features; network-analytical metrics; and more recently, data driven methodologies aimed at improving the interpretability and clinical utility of CCEP data.

Indexed as

Brain MappingCerebral CortexEpilepsyEvoked PotentialsElectrocorticographyElectroencephalographyHumansCCEPintracranial EEGSEEGSPES

Identifiers

PMID40407405
PMCPMC12455459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.