ArticleIUCrJ2025
On the flexibility of the multipole model refinement. A DFT benchmark study of the tetrakis(μ-acetato)diaquadicopper model system.
Article in IUCrJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, the flexibility of the multipole Hansen-Coppens (HC) model refinement is investigated on calculated structure factors from a DFT reference for the tetrakis(μ-acetato)diaquadicopper model system (CCDC reference 1811668). The effect of the resolution [sin(θ)/λ], the Cu scattering factor, the inclusion of anisotropic displacement parameters and the positions of the atoms in the refinement are considered in terms of statistical error analysis, residual and deformation density maps, Atoms In Molecules parameters, d-orbital populations, and others. The choice of the neutral Cu scattering factor in the HC refinement is found to give the most satisfactory results for most of the monitored parameters, despite the formal Cu
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.