ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2025
A comparative performance evaluation of 12 HIV-1 viral load testing asssays: advancing the clinical application of HIV-1 nucleic acid testing in China.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nucleic acid testing-optimized HIV diagnostic algorithms: a multimethod comparative effectiveness analysis in clinical practice.British journal of biomedical science · 2026Article
- Enhanced detection of low-level viremia by cobas 5800/6800 testing systems: a multi-center evaluation and clinical calibration study in China.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic effectiveness of HIV-1 quantitative nucleic acid assay as a supplementary test for individuals with indeterminate or negative western blot antibody test results - China, 2018-2023.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
HIV-1 viral load testing serves as a critical tool for monitoring antiretroviral therapy efficacy and detecting acute HIV-1 infections. This study evaluated the precision, linearity, and clinical performance of 12 commonly used HIV-1 viral load testing kits in China (including seven domestic and five imported kits). Precision analysis revealed that 11 kits achieved intra-assay coefficients of variation (CV%) below 5% for high and medium concentration standards at 10,000 and 1,000 IU/mL, respectively, while only 4 kits maintained comparable precision at low concentration standards (100 IU/mL). All kits showed excellent linear performance across their dynamic ranges (R² = 0.9924-0.9999) and effectively covered the major HIV-1 subtypes circulating in China. Correlation analysis of clinical samples showed strong associations (R² >0.70) in 49 out of 66 kit-pair comparisons, with Bland-Altman agreement analysis confirming good consistency between different kits. Notably, domestic Kit B exhibited minimal deviation (0.004 log10 IU/mL) compared to leading imported assays. Point-of-care testing kits demonstrated performance comparable to laboratory-based systems. However, observed variability in low viral load quantification highlights the need for improved precision to meet stringent clinical requirements for viral suppression monitoring at 50 copies/mL. These findings validate the reliability of domestic kits for clinical application while suggesting further enhancement in low-level viremia detection capabilities.IMPORTANCEHIV-1 viral load (VL) testing is extremely important in monitoring the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy and diagnosing acute HIV-1 infections. In China, the growing demand for nucleic acid testing (NAT) and rapid development of HIV-1 NAT technology have led to the approval of 15 HIV-1 VL kits by 2024, but their performance remains understudied. This study comprehensively evaluates 12 widely used HIV-1 VL kits (seven domestic and five imported) in China, demonstrating high precision, linearity, and clinical accuracy across prevalent HIV-1 subtypes in China. Notably, domestic kits exhibited a strong correlation with imported kits, validating their reliability for clinical use. However, variability in low VL quantification highlights challenges in meeting the stringent suppression threshold of 50 copies/mL. These findings provide evidence for optimizing HIV-1 NAT strategies, supporting the adoption of cost-effective domestic kits, and guiding future improvements for low-level viremia monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.