Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40407192›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental and molecular mutagenesis2025

Application of Biological Modifiers to a Multiplexed, Human Cell-Based DNA Damage Assay Provides Mechanistic Information on Genotoxicity and Molecular Targets.

Steven M Bryce, Svetlana L Avlasevich, Adam Conrad, Nikki E Hall, Kyle Tichenor, Erica Briggs, Stephen D Dertinger, Jeffrey C Bemis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. New Approach Methods in Genetic Toxicology.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Steven M BryceLitron Laboratories, Rochester, New York, USA.
Svetlana L AvlasevichLitron Laboratories, Rochester, New York, USA.
Adam ConradLitron Laboratories, Rochester, New York, USA.
Nikki E HallLitron Laboratories, Rochester, New York, USA.
Kyle TichenorLitron Laboratories, Rochester, New York, USA.
Erica BriggsLitron Laboratories, Rochester, New York, USA.
Stephen D DertingerLitron Laboratories, Rochester, New York, USA.
Jeffrey C BemisLitron Laboratories, Rochester, New York, USA.

Funding

High Throughput Screen and High Information Follow-Up Tests for GenotoxicantsR44ES033138 · NIEHS · LITRON LABORATORIES, LTD. · PI BEMIS, JEFFREY C, DERTINGER, STEPHEN D · 2021 to 2023
$1.8M
Modeling the Responsiveness of Sensitive Populations to Genotoxic Agents Using DNA Repair InhibitorsR43ES035550 · NIEHS · LITRON LABORATORIES, LTD. · PI BEMIS, JEFFREY C, DERTINGER, STEPHEN D · 2023 to 2023
$230k
NIEHS NIH HHS R43 ES035550NIEHS NIH HHS R43ES035550NIEHS NIH HHS R44 ES033138NIEHS NIH HHS R44ES033138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This laboratory has reported that the combined use of In Vitro MicroFlow and MultiFlow assays provides information regarding chemicals' genotoxic mode of action (MoA). In an effort to go beyond MoA assessments, we incorporated a panel of biological response modifiers that elicit specific effects on the assays' biomarker response profiles. This was done to pursue our hypothesis that such perturbation signatures would reveal information on clastogenic mechanisms and molecular targets. For this proof-of-concept study, we exposed TK6 cells to 20 known clastogens. Cells were exposed in 96-well plates in the presence and absence of each of four modifying agents at one optimized concentration: talazoparib (PARP inhibitor), MK-8776 (CHK1 inhibitor), AZD-7648 (DNA-PK inhibitor), or a cocktail of reactive oxygen species scavengers. In parallel, cells were also exposed to each of the test chemicals for 4 h, at which time cells were washed and allowed to recover for an additional 20 h. For each of these treatment conditions, sample processing and flow cytometric analyses were performed using standard In Vitro MicroFlow and MultiFlow procedures to measure micronuclei, γH2AX, phosphohistone-H3 (p-H3), p53 activation, and relative nuclei counts. The resulting biomarker response data were processed with PROAST benchmark dose (BMD) software, with modifying agent as a covariate. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the collective potency metrics for various combinations of biomarkers showed that clastogens with similar genotoxic mechanisms grouped together. Overall, this study shows that in combination with biological response modifiers, MultiFlow and In Vitro MicroFlow biomarkers can provide mechanistic insights into chemical-induced genotoxicity.

Indexed as

DNA DamageMutagensCell LineHistonesHumansMutagenicity TestsReactive Oxygen SpeciesHistonesMutagensReactive Oxygen Speciesgenotoxicityin vitro micronucleusmechanism of actionmode of actionnew approach methodology

Identifiers

PMID40407192
PMCPMC12237597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.