ArticleThe Australasian journal of dermatology2025
Asynchronous 3D Photography Is a Reliable Tool for the Assessment of Mycosis Fungoides Clinical Severity.
Article in The Australasian journal of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMycosis fungoides (MF) requires accurate clinical assessment for staging and management. Teledermatology aids remote evaluations, but there is limited data on the use of 3D total body photography (TBP) in assessing MF.
objectiveThis study evaluates the accuracy and reliability of assessing a patient with MF using 3D TBP compared to in-person review.
methodsThirteen MF patients were evaluated in-person using the modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) by two dermatologists, and then had 3D TBP taken. 8 weeks later, the dermatologists evaluated the virtual images. Three independent dermatologists reviewed the virtual images twice, 8 weeks apart. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) assessed agreement between in-person and virtual assessments and test-retest reliability.
resultsThere was moderate agreement (ICC = 0.71) for intra-rater in-person and virtual assessments. Test-retest reliability of virtual assessment was good (ICC = 0.79). Evaluating inter-rater agreement between in-person and virtual assessments indicated good agreement (ICC = 0.80). LIMITATIONS: 3D TBP could not capture skin on the scalp, beneath clothing and on the soles of the feet, limiting complete assessment.
conclusionClinical assessment of mSWAT using 3D TBP is as reliable as in-person mSWAT, suggesting its potential in teledermatology. Further studies are needed to validate these findings in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.