Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40407111›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of manual & manipulative therapy2026

Consensus-based dosage recommendations for sensorimotor training in the management of neck pain: a Delphi study.

Kevin Hablützel, Heike Kubat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kevin HablützelPhysiozentrum Schwindel & Gleichgewicht, Bern, Switzerland.
Heike KubatBern University of Applied Sciences (BFH), Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNeck pain is a common condition associated with high treatment costs, reduced productivity, and work limitations. It represents the second-largest group requiring physiotherapy services. Given its high prevalence, it is crucial to evaluate intervention effectiveness and ensure optimal implementation in practice. Literature highlights sensorimotor training (SMT) as an important approach in managing neck pain, though dosage recommendations for clinical application are only partially defined. This study aims to develop practical dosage guidelines for SMT in neck pain to support its implementation in daily physiotherapy.

methodsA Delphi study was conducted. Based on literature and the expertise of 12 specialists from Switzerland and Germany, dosage recommendations were developed. Two questionnaire rounds were required to reach consensus (≥ 80%).

resultsAfter the second round, 92-100% consensus was achieved on key aspects: targeted abilities, training cycle, frequency, training duration, number of exercises, sets per exercise, repetitions, time per exercise, and rest time. Additional background questions and comments contributed to a factsheet designed as a practical clinical guide. Recommended parameters include: training cycle of 4-12 weeks, 3-21 sessions/week, 10-20 minutes/session, 2-6 exercises/session, 2-5 sets/exercise, 7-15 repetitions or 20-60 seconds/exercise, and 20-40 seconds rest between sets. Further guidance is provided on targeted abilities, clinical indicators of positive effects, criteria for progression, and required adjustments for effective SMT.    .

conclusionThis study closes a knowledge gap regarding SMT dosage. The resulting factsheet aims to simplify SMT implementation for neck pain and promote its integration in daily physiotherapy practice.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyNeck PainPhysical Therapy ModalitiesConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicDelphi studyneck painSensorimotor training

Identifiers

PMID40407111
PMCPMC13061062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.