ArticleBone & joint open2025
The protocol for a multicentre prospective randomized noninferiority trial of surgical reduction versus non-surgical casting for displaced distal radius fractures in children : Children's Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial (CRAFFT) protocol.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Competence over case count: rethinking paediatric orthopaedic training.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026Article
- The Children's Urgent Reduction of Forearm Fractures in the Emergency Department (CURFFED) project : a national prospective trainee-led collaborative audit of practice.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
- Prognostic Value of Intraoperative Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability Grading in Distal Radius and Galeazzi Fractures: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrated Bone and Ligamentous Reconstruction of the Distal Radius After Oncologic Resection: Proximal Fibular Autograft Combined with Distal Oblique Bundle Reconstruction.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Changing trends in the management of pediatric distal forearm fractures: a descriptive Danish 20-year nationwide registry study of 175,083 cases.Acta orthopaedica · 2026Article
- Secondary Displacement of Forearm Fractures in Children: When to Anticipate Remodeling and When to Intervene?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Being recovered: a qualitative study of parents' experience of their child's recovery up to a year after a displaced distal radius fracture.Bone & joint open · 2024Article
- Identifying Research Priorities in Limb Reconstruction Surgery in the United Kingdom.Strategies in trauma and limb reconstructionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: The remarkable capacity for distal radius fractures in children to remodel raises questions about the necessity and extent of the intervention required to achieve anatomical alignment. The British Society of Children's Orthopaedic Surgery prioritized this uncertainty as one of their most important research questions. This is the protocol for a randomized, controlled, multicentre, prospective, noninferiority trial of non-surgical casting versus surgical reduction for severely displaced fractures of the distal radius in children: the Children's Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial. Methods: Children aged four to ten years old inclusive, who have sustained a severely displaced distal radius fracture, are eligible to take part. Baseline function using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Score, pain measured using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale, and quality of life (QoL) assessed with the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire for younger participants will be collected. Each patient will be randomly allocated (1:1), stratified using a minimization algorithm by centre, fracture type at presentation (completely off-ended or incompletely off-ended), fracture location (metaphyseal or physeal), and age group (four to six years or seven to ten years) to either a regimen of non-surgical casting or surgical reduction. Conclusion: At six weeks, and three, six, and 12 months, data on function, pain, QoL, cosmesis, and satisfaction with care will be collected. After completion of the main phase of the study, patients will be followed up for a further two years. Up to one year after randomization, the main outcomes plus data on complications, resource use, and school absence will be collected. The primary outcome is the PROMIS Upper Extremity Score at three months post-randomization. All data will be obtained through electronic questionnaires completed by the participants and/or parents/guardians.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.