ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2025
Motivations, barriers and enablers for medical and forensic examiners in New South Wales sexual assault services: a qualitative interview study.
Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo understand the motivations, barriers and enablers for doctors and nurses to work as medical and forensic examiners in New South Wales sexual assault services.
designQualitative interview study using semi-structured interviews.
settingInterviews were conducted from 1 May to 31 August 2023 in NSW, Australia.
participantsThirty-one participants (27 female; 23 doctors, 8 nurses) - who were currently working as examiners in a NSW Health sexual assault service, had left the role within the previous 3 years, or had undertaken training for this role within the previous 3 years but were not working in this capacity - were recruited by email invitation from the NSW Health Education Centre Against Violence.
main outcome measuresKey themes affecting workforce participation.
resultsUsing inductive thematic analysis, we determined four key themes affecting workforce participation: the responsibility burden, on-call challenges, high expectations of medicolegal expertise, and inadequate human resources affecting supervisor and peer support. The workforce was highly motivated and, in the absence of sufficient organisational support, this became a responsibility burden. For many participants, the most challenging aspect of their role was being predominantly on call, which made them feel isolated, invaded their personal time, and affected their preferred mechanisms for managing the traumatic aspects of the work, which were peer support and compartmentalisation. Medicolegal responsibilities were motivating for some participants but represented a significant barrier for many due to high expectations and unfamiliarity. Adequate staffing, opportunities for workplace-based education, and more supervisor and peer support were desired.
conclusionAdditional support for medical and forensic examiners can overcome barriers, particularly regarding the medicolegal aspects of the role. Employers should ensure the work conditions of examiners enable them to participate in the workforce safely, ensuring that the strong motivations to participate are not undone by organisational factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.