Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40406805›Full record

GuidelineJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology2025

Quality Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand: A Joint Position Statement.

Linda S Yang, Abir Halder, Bronte A Holt, Benedict Devereaux, Matthew Remedios, Neil Merrett, Marianne Lill, Zoe Raos, Malcolm Arnold, Nicholas G Burgess and 2 more

Abstract readPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Linda S YangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne and the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abir HalderDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9201-2111
Bronte A HoltDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne and the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Benedict DevereauxDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1795-5690
Matthew RemediosDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Neil MerrettDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Bankstown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8370-0293
Marianne LillDepartment of General Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Whanganui, Whanganui, Aotearoa New Zealand.
Zoe RaosDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Te Whatu Ora Waitematā, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand.
Malcolm ArnoldDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Te Whatu Ora Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, Aotearoa New Zealand.
Nicholas G BurgessDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sneha JohnDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9332-3826
Krish RagunathDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quality standards for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy are required to identify key quality indicators that are relevant to Australasian endoscopic practice and local patient populations. Such standards will promote equitable access to high-quality UGI endoscopy for appropriate indications across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. The Gastroenterological Society of Australia (GESA) Endoscopy Faculty's quality of UGI endoscopy working group conducted a review of published guidelines on quality standards in UGI endoscopy. A literature search was performed using the MEDLINE database, with further references sourced from bibliographies of published papers. Recommendations from international guidelines and available evidence were reviewed, and their relevance to the Australian clinical context was assessed. The working group then formulated a position statement on quality assurance in UGI endoscopy in Australian practice. A further iterative process involving the Endoscopy Guidance Group for New Zealand (EGGNZ) and the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) culminated in the final recommendations for practice in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. The recommendations in this position statement are categorized into preprocedural, intraprocedural, and postprocedural. As UGI endoscopy examines several anatomical structures and is performed for a wider range of indications than colonoscopy, disease-specific intraprocedural recommendations for common benign and premalignant conditions of the UGI tract are also presented. This GESA initiative was undertaken in collaboration with the RACS and endorsed by GESA, RACS, the Royal Australasian College of Physicians, and EGGNZ, membership of which includes the New Zealand Society of Gastroenterology, the New Zealand Association of General Surgeons, and other local endoscopy stakeholders.

Indexed as

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalQuality Assurance, Health CareAustraliaHumansNew ZealandQuality Indicators, Health CareSocieties, Medicalendoscopygastroscopyquality

Identifiers

PMID40406805
PMCPMC12315793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.