ArticleCureus2025
Bridging the Knowledge Gap: Awareness, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Menstrual Cup Usage Among Medical Students in Chennai, India.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing a Community-Based Model for the Adoption of Sustainable Menstrual Products Among Adolescent Girls: Protocol for a 2-Phase Interventional Feasibility Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Perspectives of Indian adolescent girls in promoting menstrual health: A qualitative analysis.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background In India, sanitary pads are the most used menstrual hygiene product despite potential health and environmental risks. Menstrual cups offer a safer, sustainable alternative, but lack widespread study. This study examines awareness, attitudes, and practices of menstrual cup use among medical students and factors influencing adoption. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted at a private medical college in Chennai in India among 250 medical students. Participants were selected through simple random sampling. After obtaining informed consent, data collection was carried out using a pre-structured and pre-tested questionnaire. Data was entered into MS Excel (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25 (Released 2017; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). Descriptive statistics are presented in tables, analytical statistics include the calculation of unadjusted odds ratios, followed by logistic regression analysis to assess associations between relevant variables. Results Among the 250 study participants, more than two-thirds were aged between 18 and ≤ 21 years. Poor knowledge about menstrual cups (56.4%), unfavorable attitudes (57.6%), and menstrual cup usage of 46.4% were noted among the study participants. Key factors significantly associated with poor knowledge about menstrual cups included family members who did not use menstrual cups (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 3.21), non-availability of menstrual cups (AOR 5.12), experiencing frequent menstrual problems (AOR 2.11), and receiving doctors' advice regarding menstrual issues (AOR 2.91). Unfavorable attitudes were linked to concerns while purchasing sanitary napkins (AOR 3.60), non-usage by family members (AOR 2.16), non-availability (AOR 3.10), menstrual issues (menorrhagia, recurrent infections), disposal concerns (AOR 2.60), and perceived difficulty of use (AOR 4.17). Conclusion This study highlights the necessity for enhanced education on menstrual hygiene practices, even within the medical community, to address the knowledge gap. It is essential to educate young medical students on the benefits and drawbacks of menstrual cups, with a focus on why they are a safer and more eco-sustainable option. Future research should be conducted in community settings to allow for the generalization of the findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.