Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40406785›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Effects of Target Clarity on Monocular Blur Suppression: A Video Simulation of Simultaneous Vision Multifocal Lens Correction.

Yo Iwata, Tomoya Handa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yo IwataSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, JPN.
Tomoya HandaSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the effects of target clarity on monocular blur suppression while using simultaneous vision multifocal lenses through video simulation.

methodsTwenty healthy adults (mean age 20.8±6.1 years) were presented with circular targets at three spatial frequencies (3, 6, and 18 cpd). Gaussian blur filter simulated full refractive correction (0 pixels of blur) and two levels of residual refractive error correction (10 pixels and 20 pixels, respectively). For each target condition, a 50% transparent image with the same spatial frequency was superimposed, with its blur gradually increasing by 0.1 pixels every 0.2 s. The time until participants detected additional blur compared to the initial state was measured and analyzed.

resultsParticipants perceived blur significantly earlier in the two levels of residual refractive error models (10 and 20 pixels of initial blur) compared to the full refractive correction model across all spatial frequencies (p < 0.017). Spatial frequency also influenced blur perception, with detection occurring significantly earlier at higher cpd values across initial blur conditions.

conclusionsResidual refractive error appears to impair the function of monocular blur suppression, aggravating the perception of ghost images. Full refractive correction is therefore essential for effectively suppressing these unwanted visual artifacts.

Indexed as

contact lensintraocular lensmonocular blur suppressionrefractive correctionsimultaneous vision multifocal lens

Identifiers

PMID40406785
PMCPMC12097721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.