Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40406734›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry2025

Assessing childhood maltreatment exposure using the child behavior checklist.

Takuya Makino, Shota Nishitani, Shinichiro Takiguchi, Akiko Yao, Takashi X Fujisawa, Akemi Tomoda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Takuya MakinoDivision of Developmental Higher Brain Functions, United Graduate School of Child Development, The University of Osaka, Kanazawa University, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Chiba University, University of Fukui, Osaka, Japan.
Shota NishitaniDivision of Developmental Higher Brain Functions, United Graduate School of Child Development, The University of Osaka, Kanazawa University, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Chiba University, University of Fukui, Osaka, Japan.
Shinichiro TakiguchiDivision of Developmental Higher Brain Functions, United Graduate School of Child Development, The University of Osaka, Kanazawa University, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Chiba University, University of Fukui, Osaka, Japan.
Akiko YaoResearch Center for Child Mental Development, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Takashi X FujisawaDivision of Developmental Higher Brain Functions, United Graduate School of Child Development, The University of Osaka, Kanazawa University, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Chiba University, University of Fukui, Osaka, Japan.
Akemi TomodaDivision of Developmental Higher Brain Functions, United Graduate School of Child Development, The University of Osaka, Kanazawa University, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Chiba University, University of Fukui, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Childhood maltreatment (CM) has broad and severe adverse effects in later life, but there are not enough studies conducted during childhood close to the time of maltreatment. Most studies have focused only on a single symptom and have not attempted to capture the global picture of CM. Methods: We used the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) to assess children's behavioral/emotional problems more comprehensively. This study leveraged 32 CM children and 29 typically developing (TD) children who have been assessed using the CBCL 4-18 from our dataset. Group comparisons of the eight subscales were conducted to characterize each behavioral/emotional problem. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to assess the classification performance. Finally, sensitive period and type analyses were performed based on the children's maltreatment history. Results: The CM group showed significantly higher behavioral/emotional problems in seven out of the eight subscales. Logistic regression analysis was performed using all combinations of CBCL subscale T-scores and age, sex, and IQ. We created 2047 models and performed ROC analysis for each. Three models were generated: the most accurate model (comprising CBCL T-score, age, sex, and IQ; sensitivity: 0.906, specificity: 0.966), a model excluding IQ (sensitivity: 0.875, specificity: 0.931), and a model consisting only of CBCL (sensitivity: 0.906, specificity: 0.862). The CBCL demonstrated robust predictive capacity for CM by utilizing information provided by caregivers, without directly inquiring about trauma. The sensitive period analysis revealed that the temporal predictor of severity for "withdrawn" and "thought problems" were exposure to CM at age five. Similarly, exposure to CM between the ages of five and seven predicted "somatic complaints". In the case of type, physical abuse was the predictor for "somatic complaints" and "delinquent behavior", and emotional abuse was the predictor for "anxious/depressed" and "thought problems". Conclusion: Maltreated children present a wider range of behavioral/emotional problems, which must be considered when supporting them. Perspectives gained from sensitive analyses of maltreatment history will help clinicians provide more appropriate interventions.

Indexed as

child abusechild behavior checklistchildhood maltreatmentROC curve analysissensitive analyses

Identifiers

PMID40406734
PMCPMC12095179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.