ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Developing a generalized nonlinear mixed-effects biomass model at stand-level under different age conditions for Chinese fir based on LiDAR and ground survey data in southern China.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Divergent allometric strategies and biomass allocation patterns of four key tree taxa in subtropical China.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Estimation of individual tree aboveground biomass of genetically diverseFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Predicting individual tree diameter at breast height for genetically diverseFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chinese fir Methods: This study utilized data from 154 forest stands in Guangdong Province to develop biomass regression models that incorporate random effects and dummy variables. The models were based on airborne LiDAR-derived metrics. Among 41 highly correlated LiDAR variables, only two-5% cumulative height percentile and leaf area index-were retained in the final model. Results: The results revealed that the logistic mixed-effects model was the most effective for estimating leaf biomass, while the empirical mixed-effects model was better suited for other biomass components. Nonlinear models outperformed linear models, with the nonlinear mixed-effects model (incorporating stand age as a random effect) achieving the highest predictive accuracy. Furthermore, machine learning techniques further improved model performance (R² = 0.855 to 0.939). Validation with independent test samples confirmed the robustness and reliability of the nonlinear mixed-effects model. Discussion: This study highlights the effectiveness of airborne LiDAR data in providing efficient and precise estimates of stand biomass. It also emphasizes the significant role of stand developmental stages in biomass modeling. The findings contribute to the development of a rigorous and scalable framework for large-scale artificial forest biomass estimation, which has important implications for forest resource monitoring, ecological industry development, and ecosystem management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.