ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Automatic diagnosis and measurement of intracranial aneurysms using deep learning in MRA raw images.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in neurovascular surgery: advancing diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The traditional procedure of intracranial aneurysm (IA) diagnosis and evaluation in MRA is manually operated, which is time-consuming and labor-intensive. In this study, a deep learning model was established to diagnose and measure IA automatically based on the original MR images. Methods: A total of 1,014 IAs (from 852 patients) from hospital 1 were included and randomly divided into training, testing, and internal validation sets in a 7:2:1 ratio. Additionally, 315 patients (179 cases with IA and 136 cases without IA) from hospital 2 were used for independent validation. A deep learning model of MR 3DUnet was established for IA diagnosis and size measurement. The true positive (TP), false positive (FP), false negative (FN), recall, sensitivity, and specificity indices were used to evaluate the diagnosis performance of MR 3DUnet. The two-sample Results: The fully automatic model processed the original MRA data in 13.6 s and provided real-time results, including IA diagnosis and size measurement. For the IA diagnosis, in the training, testing, and internal validation sets, the recall rates were 0.80, 0.75, and 0.79, and the sensitivities were 0.82, 0.75, and 0.75, respectively. In the independent validation set, the recall rate, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.71, 0.74, 0.77, and 0.75, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed a recall rate of 0.74 for IA diagnosis based on DSA. For IA size measurement, no significant difference was found between our MR 3DUnet and the manual measurements of DSA or MRA. Conclusion: In this study, a one-click, fully automatic deep learning model was developed for automatic IA diagnosis and size measurement based on 2D original images. It has the potential to significantly improve doctors' work efficiency and reduce patients' examination time, making it highly valuable in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.