Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40406670›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2025

Mars: simplifying bioinformatics workflows through a containerized approach to tool integration and management.

Fathima Nuzla Ismail, Shanika Amarasoma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fathima Nuzla IsmailDepartment of Mathematics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0716-1478
Shanika AmarasomaIndependent Researcher, AI & Advanced Analytics, Colombo 01100, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9509-0069

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Summary: Bioinformatics is a rapidly evolving field with numerous specialized tools developed for essential genomic analysis tasks, such as read simulation, mapping, and variant calling. However, managing these tools presents significant challenges due to varied dependencies, execution steps, and output formats, complicating the installation and configuration processes. To address these issues, we introduce "Mars" a bioinformatics solution encapsulated within a singularity container that preloads a comprehensive suite of widely used genomic tools. Mars not only simplifies the installation of these tools but also automates critical workflow functions, including sequence sample preparation, read simulation, read mapping, variant calling, and result comparison. By streamlining the execution of these workflows, Mars enables users to easily manage input-output formats and compare results across different tools, thereby enhancing reproducibility and efficiency. Furthermore, by providing a cohesive environment that integrates tool management with a flexible workflow interface, Mars empowers researchers to focus on their analyses rather than the complexities of tool configuration. This integrated solution facilitates the testing of various combinations of tools and algorithms, enabling users to evaluate performance based on different metrics and identify the optimal tools for their specific genomic analysis needs. Through Mars, we aim to enhance the accessibility and usability of bioinformatics tools, ultimately advancing research in genomic analysis. Availability and implementation: Mars is freely available at https://github.com/GenomicAI/mars. It is implemented within a Singularity container environment and supports modular extension for additional genomic tools and custom workflows.

Identifiers

PMID40406670
PMCPMC12095131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.