ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2025
Attention Rings for Shape Analysis and Application to MRI Quality Control.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study collects extensive neuroimaging data, including over 20,000 MRI sessions, to understand brain development in children. Ensuring high-quality MRI data is essential for accurate analysis, but manual Quality Control (QC) is impractical for large datasets due to time and resource constraints. We propose an automated QC method using an ensemble model that leverages metrics from FSQC and a novel deep learning model for brain shape analysis that uses cortical thickness, curvature, sulcal depth, and surface area as input features. The ensemble model achieved an accuracy of 76%, while our method achieved an accuracy of 72.62%, with balanced precision, recall, and F1 scores for both classes. This automated method promises to improve QC processes and accelerate the analysis of ABCD data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.