Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40406663›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of psychological assessment2024

Experiences of experts in intelligence measurement of South African school learners.

Ilze van der Merwe, Petro Erasmus, Werner de Klerk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of psychological assessment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ilze van der MerweSchool of Psychosocial Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4330-5093
Petro ErasmusSchool of Psychosocial Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8004-3964
Werner de KlerkSchool of Psychosocial Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4422-2281

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This qualitative research study emerged from the essential need for reliable and valid intelligence test instruments for South African school learners, who are characterised as a diverse population with their variety in culture, ethnicity, and language, as well as having unequal socio-economic and educational backgrounds. The aim of this research study was to use a qualitative interpretive description research design to explore and describe the experiences of both experts in intelligence test development and/or adaptation as well as psychologists and psychometrists who have administered intelligence tests to South African school learners in various contexts. Twelve psychologists and/or psychometrists were interviewed, of which six were also experts in test development and/or adaptation, which yielded four themes after thematic analysis, namely, utilised intelligence measurements in the current South African school learner context are less relevant; the South African education system is a major issue specifically within lower socio-economic status (SES) contexts; it does not seem feasible to design or adapt suitable intelligence measures that are valid and reliable in the current South African school learner context; and key informants' recommendations from their experiences. Contribution: This research study contributes to the understanding of the measurement of intelligence of South African school learners in diverse contexts. Findings of this research study can guide the strategic process to design an intelligence instrument suitable for a South African population of school learners, informing fair assessment practices for multiethnic equalisation.

Indexed as

developmentexperiencesintelligence assessmentqualitativeschool learnersSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID40406663
PMCPMC12082259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.