ArticleFrontiers in toxicology2025
Rat embryonic stem cell-based
Article in Frontiers in toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The international guidelines outlining the mandatory developmental toxicology studies of new molecules on pre-implantation, post-implantation and organogenesis phases, require a minimum of 60 pregnant female rats for each molecule to be tested. To date, available in vitro methods still have many limitations, resulting in poor translational power. Methods: In the present study, an innovative in vitro platform is proposed, based on rat embryonic stem cells (RESCs), which is easy to use and suitable for wide-scale screening, mimicking two different developmental stages: i) pre-implant model (undifferentiated pluripotent cells), ii) post-implant model (neuroectodermal lineage differentiation). Results: The in vitro platform was validated by testing the toxicity on the pre-implant model of RA itself, as a known teratogen, a member of the environmental pollutant family per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), the perfluorooctanic acid (PFOA), and the endocrine disruptor chemical 2,2',6,6'-tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) as test compound, targeting the thyroid hormone (TH) signal. The post-implant model showed inactivation of the pluripotent markers and activation of the neuroectodermal markers. The preimplant model resulted high responsive and sensitive to the embryotoxic effect of the tested compounds. The TBBPA was selected to test the potential effects of on viability and neuroectodermal differentiation, assessed through colorimetric and cell-based high-content screening methods establishing sub-toxic (20 μM) and toxic (40 μM) doses. A high-throughput gene expression array-based analysis showed a prompt response of the in vitro testing platform to TBBPA treatment. A rescue experiment exploiting a pan-thyroid receptor (pan-TR) inhibitor (1-850) showed that the effects of TBBPA on RESCs was blocked, demonstrating its activity through TRs. Discussion: The RESCs-based platform allowed reproducible, robust and highly predictable results, thanks to the coupling of RESCs with high-throughput technologies. These results support the possible use of RESCs-based models as a screening platform for developmental toxicity testing to reduce the number of animals currently used for this aim.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.