ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
The Adipofascial Lateral Intercostal Perforator Flap in Partial Breast Reconstruction.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role of chest wall perforator flaps in reconstruction of upper inner breast defects.BMC surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The lateral intercostal artery perforator flap, first described by Hamdi et al as a partial replacement technique for breast-conserving surgery (BCS), was traditionally a fasciocutaneous flap with the inherent skin scar on the lateral chest wall. Trying to limit donor site morbidity, we further modified the original lateral intercostal artery perforator flap, harvesting tissue on the same perforator without the skin paddle, the associated scar, and the need to reposition the patient on the operating table. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 52 patients who underwent partial breast replacement after BCS between 2015 and 2020. We compared the 27 patients with the adipofascial lateral intercostal perforator flap (ALIP) with the remaining 25 replacement flaps regarding postoperative complications and aesthetic outcomes. Results: An increased number of postoperative seromas were detected in the ALIP group according to the Clavien-Dindo classification; however, most of them were minor and did not delay adjuvant treatments or compromise cosmetic results. The aesthetic outcome evaluated through the Web BCCT.core workstation 1 year after surgery was shown to be identical between both groups. Conclusions: The ALIP represents an alternative flap for tissue replacement in BCS, achieving overall similar complication rates and identical aesthetic outcomes when compared with other local perforator flaps, with reduced skin scars.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.