Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40406594›Full record

ArticleMachine learning and knowledge extraction2025

Machine-Learned Codes from EHR Data Predict Hard Outcomes Better than Human-Assigned ICD Codes.

Ying Yin, Yijun Shao, Phillip Ma, Qing Zeng-Treitler, Stuart J Nelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Machine learning and knowledge extraction, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ying YinBiomedical Informatics Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Yijun ShaoBiomedical Informatics Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Phillip MaBiomedical Informatics Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Qing Zeng-TreitlerBiomedical Informatics Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Stuart J NelsonBiomedical Informatics Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.

Funding

AHRQ HHS R01 HS028450HSRD VA I21 HX003278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used machine learning (ML) to characterize 894,154 medical records of outpatient visits from the Veterans Administration Central Data Warehouse (VA CDW) by the likelihood of assignment of 200 International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code blocks. Using four different predictive models, we found the ML-derived predictions for the code blocks were consistently more effective in predicting death or 90-day rehospitalization than the assigned code block in the record. We reviewed records of ICD chapter assignments. The review revealed that the ML-predicted chapter assignments were consistently better than those humanly assigned. Impact factor analysis, a method of explanation of AI findings that was developed in our group, demonstrated little effect on any one assigned ICD code block but a marked impact on the ML-derived code blocks of kidney disease as well as several other morbidities. In this study, machine learning was much better than human code assignment at predicting the relatively rare outcomes of death or rehospitalization. Future work will address generalizability using other datasets, as well as addressing coding that is more nuanced than that of the categorization provided by code blocks.

Indexed as

ICD codingimpact factorsmachine learning predictionmorbiditymortality

Identifiers

PMID40406594
PMCPMC12093355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.