Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40406498›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025

Availability of consistent, reliable, and actionable public data on US hospital administrative expenses.

Nikhil R Sahni, Brooke Istvan, Heather Bello Thornhill, Karen E Joynt-Maddox, David Cutler, Ezekiel J Emanuel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nikhil R SahniEconomics Department, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States.
Brooke IstvanGraduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7263-4612
Heather Bello ThornhillCenter for US Healthcare Improvement, McKinsey & Company, Boston, MA 02110, United States.
Karen E Joynt-MaddoxCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3779-8653
David CutlerEconomics Department, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4949-8917
Ezekiel J EmanuelHealthcare Transformation Institute, Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine and The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health care spending continues to rise, and opportunities to decrease costs without negatively impacting patient care are a priority. Addressing administrative spending, approximately 25% of US health care spending, is an opportunity. To identify savings, hospitals and policymakers need data to quantify administrative expense categories and establish benchmarks for comparisons. However, it is unknown whether the Medicare Cost Reports-the only universal, public source for US hospital financials-accurately capture administrative expenses. We found that, at the national level, administrative expenses for 5639 hospitals were $166.1 billion, or 17.0% of total hospital expenses. A total of 4417 (78.3%) hospitals reported only a single overall "administrative and general" expense, averaging 18.9% (SD: 5.8%) of total hospital expenses, while 1222 (21.7%) provided detailed data on administrative expenses averaging 17.1% (SD: 5.0%) in sum. For those reporting subcategories, "other administrative and general" represented $37.6 billion (66.1%). Of the 3971 subcategories reported, 31.2% appeared mislabeled. In summary, hospitals report widely variable administrative expenses (7.0 percentage points between the 25th and 75th percentile), with few detailed, and often mislabeled, data to guide the identification of savings opportunities. As structured today, the Medicare Cost Reports are not a consistent, reliable, or actionable dataset to aid hospitals or policymakers in quantifying and addressing excess administrative spending.

Indexed as

administrative spendinghospital expensesMedicare cost reports

Identifiers

PMID40406498
PMCPMC12096959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.