Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40406497›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025

Medicaid expansion increased income among newly eligible adults.

Stacy Chen, Becky Staiger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stacy ChenDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA 94704, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9120-0995
Becky StaigerDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA 94704, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4557-6233

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion improved health care access for low-income Americans; however, its impact on economic outcomes-particularly income-is less clear. We used US Census administrative income data that tracked 6120 cohorts covering 84% of working-age adults from 2005 to 2019. Using difference-in-differences, we compared changes in income among low-income adults living in expansion states, before and after expansion, with changes in income in low-income adults living in non-expansion states. Low-income adults living in Medicaid-expansion states experienced an average 9.5% relative increase in income in the 5 years after expansion. This impact was concentrated among adults who were likely newly eligible for Medicaid after the expansion. These adults experienced a 9.6% relative increase in income, as well as a 2.1 percentage point (7.3%) relative higher likelihood of having income in the 40th income percentile or higher. We found suggestive evidence that a reduction in unpaid time off from work drove a small part of this relative income increase among those newly eligible. While Medicaid funding faces substantial political uncertainty, this evidence suggests that welfare gains to newly eligible individuals include economic, as well as health, improvements.

Indexed as

economic outcomesincomeMedicaidMedicaid expansion

Identifiers

PMID40406497
PMCPMC12096067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.