Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40406477›Full record

Observational studyRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2025

Evaluation of pathological complete response rates in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy.

Gabriella Ferezini Oliveira de Sá, Pedro Vilar de Oliveira Villarim, Pedro Hortêncio Saboia da Escossia Melo, Ayane Cristine Alves Sarmento, Ana Katherine Gonçalves, Kleyton Santos de Medeiros, Cristina Rocha de Medeiros Miranda

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gabriella Ferezini Oliveira de SáUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte NatalRN Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0972-0372
Pedro Vilar de Oliveira VillarimUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte NatalRN Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9504-8589
Pedro Hortêncio Saboia da Escossia MeloUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte NatalRN Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2771-4242
Ayane Cristine Alves SarmentoUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte NatalRN Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9131-1952
Ana Katherine GonçalvesUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte NatalRN Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8351-5119
Kleyton Santos de MedeirosUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte NatalRN Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4105-7535
Cristina Rocha de Medeiros MirandaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte NatalRN Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9301-7917

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to assess the rate of pathological complete response (pCR) in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy and to explore its correlation with clinical, molecular, and prognostic factors. Methods: We conducted this retrospective observational study at Liga Contra o Câncer, a major public oncology reference center in Northeast Brazil. We included patients diagnosed with breast cancer who initiated neoadjuvant therapy between June 2018 and June 2019. Patients with a history of recurrent breast cancer or those who did not undergo surgery were excluded. The primary outcome was the pCR rate, with secondary outcomes including Overall Survival (OS), Disease-Free Survival (DFS), mortality, and disease recurrence. Follow-up extended until August 2022. We performed multivariate Cox regression analysis to correlate outcomes with predetermined variables. Results: Of the 292 included patients, 63 (21.6%) achieved pCR. The mean follow-up duration was 42.8 months. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed an association between pCR and the AC-TH regimen [OR = 2.4; 95%CI = 1.13 - 5.24; p=0.023], as well as between pCR and HER2-positive tumors [OR 2.49; 95% CI = 1.14 - 5.86; p=0.028]. Complete pathological response was associated with higher DFS [HR 0.33; 95%CI 0.13-0.86; p=0.024]. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant therapy demonstrated significant efficacy in achieving pathological response in breast cancer patients. We observed a strong association between the AC-TH regimen, HER2-positive status, and pCR.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBreast neoplasmNeoadjuvant therapySurgical oncology

Identifiers

PMID40406477
PMCPMC12097449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.