ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2025
Accuracy and interpretability of smartwatch electrocardiogram for early detection of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Tier Validation of a Single-Lead Wearable ECG Signal-Processing Pipeline: Clinical Comparison and Algorithmic Benchmarking on Public Expert-Annotated Databases.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Factors Associated with Arrhythmia in Patients with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.Research in heart yield and translational medicine · 2026Article
- Advancing Atrial Fibrillation Screening-Clinical Utility and Future Directions of Smartwatch ECG.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Article
- Accuracy and interpretability of smartwatch electrocardiogram for early detection of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AFib) continues to increase globally, posing a significant risk for serious cardiovascular complications, such as ischemic stroke and thromboembolism. Smartwatch single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) can be a practical and accurate early detection tool for AFib. Objective: The aim of this study was to fill the research gap in evaluating the accuracy and interpretability of smartwatch ECG for early AFib detection. Methods: Data derived from indexed literature in the Scopus, Scilit, PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, IEEE, and Cochrane Library databases (as of June 1, 2024) were systematically screened and extracted. The quantitative synthesis was performed using a two-level mixed-effects logistic regression model, as well as a proportional analysis with Freeman-Tukey double transformation on a restricted maximum-likelihood model. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of smartwatch ECG in algorithmic readings were 86% and 94%, respectively. In manual readings, the sensitivity and specificity reached 96% and 95%, respectively. In a brand-specific subgroup analysis, the algorithmic reading reached a summary area under the curve (sAUC) of 96%, while another brand achieved the highest sAUC of 98% in manual reading. The level of manual interpretability was relatively high with Cohen's Kappa of 0.83, but 3% of ECG results were difficult to read manually. Conclusion: This study shows that smartwatch ECG is able to detect AFib with high accuracy, especially through manual reading by trained medical personnel. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024548537 (May 29, 2024).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.