Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40406413›Full record

ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2025

Accuracy and interpretability of smartwatch electrocardiogram for early detection of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Muhammad Iqhrammullah, Asnawi Abdullah, Hermansyah, Fahmi Ichwansyah, Hafnidar A Rani, Meulu Alina, Artha M T Simanjuntak, Derren D C H Rampengan, Seba Talat Al-Gunaid, Naufal Gusti and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Muhammad IqhrammullahPostgraduate Program of Public Health Universitas Muhammadiyah Aceh Banda Aceh Indonesia.
Asnawi AbdullahPostgraduate Program of Public Health Universitas Muhammadiyah Aceh Banda Aceh Indonesia.
HermansyahPostgraduate Program of Public Health Universitas Muhammadiyah Aceh Banda Aceh Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4703-098X
Fahmi IchwansyahPostgraduate Program of Public Health Universitas Muhammadiyah Aceh Banda Aceh Indonesia.
Hafnidar A RaniDepartment of Civil Engineering Universitas Muhammadiyah Aceh Banda Aceh Indonesia.
Meulu AlinaFaculty of Medicine Universitas Syiah Kuala Banda Aceh Indonesia.
Artha M T SimanjuntakFaculty of Medicine Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta Indonesia.
Derren D C H RampenganFaculty of Medicine Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado Indonesia.
Seba Talat Al-GunaidFaculty of Medicine Universitas Syiah Kuala Banda Aceh Indonesia.
Naufal GustiPostgraduate Program of Public Health Universitas Muhammadiyah Aceh Banda Aceh Indonesia.
Arditya DamarkusumaDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta Indonesia.
Edza Aria WikurendraDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Health Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya Surabaya Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5020-375X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AFib) continues to increase globally, posing a significant risk for serious cardiovascular complications, such as ischemic stroke and thromboembolism. Smartwatch single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) can be a practical and accurate early detection tool for AFib. Objective: The aim of this study was to fill the research gap in evaluating the accuracy and interpretability of smartwatch ECG for early AFib detection. Methods: Data derived from indexed literature in the Scopus, Scilit, PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, IEEE, and Cochrane Library databases (as of June 1, 2024) were systematically screened and extracted. The quantitative synthesis was performed using a two-level mixed-effects logistic regression model, as well as a proportional analysis with Freeman-Tukey double transformation on a restricted maximum-likelihood model. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of smartwatch ECG in algorithmic readings were 86% and 94%, respectively. In manual readings, the sensitivity and specificity reached 96% and 95%, respectively. In a brand-specific subgroup analysis, the algorithmic reading reached a summary area under the curve (sAUC) of 96%, while another brand achieved the highest sAUC of 98% in manual reading. The level of manual interpretability was relatively high with Cohen's Kappa of 0.83, but 3% of ECG results were difficult to read manually. Conclusion: This study shows that smartwatch ECG is able to detect AFib with high accuracy, especially through manual reading by trained medical personnel. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024548537 (May 29, 2024).

Indexed as

arrhythmiaatrial fibrillationECGelectrocardiogramsmartwatch

Identifiers

PMID40406413
PMCPMC12096014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.