ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
B.T.C.H. nephrolithometry score: a novel scoring system to predict stone-free rate and complexity for ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The existing scoring systems for percutaneous nephrolithotomy fail to adequately consider the influence of renal anatomy, leading to limited predictive accuracy. This study introduces and validates a novel B.T.C.H. nephrolithometry score, designed to better predict stone-free rates and complexity for ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Methods: B.T.C.H. nephrolithometry score evaluates four variables including stone burden, type of renal pelvis, calyces involved, and hydronephrosis. 134 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy at Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The inter-observer agreement was assessed using the linearly weighted kappa coefficient. The accuracy in predicting the stone-free rate was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Spearman's correlation analysis and Kendall's W test were employed to examine the correlation between the scores of each scoring system and operative time, the number of tracts and CDC scores. Results: The overall stone-free rate was 52.99%. The stone-free rates in low (4-8 points), medium (9-12 points), and high (13-15 points) B.T.C.H. scores were 91.9, 24.6, and 0%, respectively. The B.T.C.H. nephrolithometry score had an AUC of 0.909 for predicting stone-free rate, outperforming both the GSS (AUC = 0.761) and the S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry score (AUC = 0.763). The B.T.C.H. nephrolithometry score were positively correlated with operative time, the number of tracts and CDC scores. Conclusion: B.T.C.H. nephrolithometry score is a suggested novel scoring system for ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy, which had superior prediction of stone-free rate and positive correlation with operative time, the number of tracts, and postoperative CDC scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.