ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Interest in Long-Acting Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among Men at Risk for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Who Use Methamphetamine Participating in a Daily, Oral PrEP Adherence Trial in San Francisco, California.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Provider Perspectives on the Delivery of Long-Acting PrEP for HIV Prevention to Men Who Have Sex with Men and Who Use Methamphetamine.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2026Article
- High Motivation but Low Access to PrEP: Social Determinants Undermine HIV Prevention Among Sexual and Gender Minority People Who Use Methamphetamine.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Methamphetamine use is associated with increased risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and suboptimal adherence to daily, oral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Long-acting PrEP is a promising HIV prevention method for people who use methamphetamine. Methods: We conducted interviews with participants of a daily, oral PrEP adherence trial at their final visit. Participants were assigned male at birth and reported past-month methamphetamine use and past-year condomless sex with a partner with HIV or unknown status. We conducted a thematic analysis of interview transcripts to assess experiences with daily, oral PrEP and interest in long-acting PrEP. Results: Of 23 participants, median age was 42 (interquartile range, 33-48) years, all were cisgender men, most were White (73%), and approximately half had been homeless or lived in a shelter in the past year (52%). The most common daily, oral PrEP adherence challenges were forgetting to take the medication, followed by not having the medication available and competing priorities. Most participants (91%) were interested in long-acting PrEP. A plurality (43%) preferred injection as the modality, 39% preferred a long-acting pill, and 17% an implant. Most concerns about long-acting PrEP regarded the implant, including the length of time drug is in the body and the insertion/removal procedure; frequent clinic visits were another concern. Conclusions: Most participants who used methamphetamine were interested in and described barriers to daily medications that could be mitigated by long-acting PrEP. Injections were the most preferred modality, although long-acting oral PrEP alleviated concerns for some. Future research should assess optimization of long-acting PrEP delivery to this at-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.