Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40406340›Full record

ArticlePsychology research and behavior management2025

Exploring Family Functioning and Adolescent Academic Anxiety: Emotional Stability and Social Support as Mediators.

Min Gao, Weifang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology research and behavior management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Min GaoSchool of Sociology, Sanya University Sanya, Hainan, 572022, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0009-4702-8776
Weifang LiuSchool of Sociology, Sanya University Sanya, Hainan, 572022, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: With the intensification of social competition, the phenomenon of academic credential inflation has become increasingly severe, highlighting the growing importance of education. Although existing research has focused on individual factors related to academic anxiety, the roles of family functioning, emotional stability, and social support in alleviating academic anxiety remain underexplored. In particular, these factors may exert different influences across diverse cultural contexts. Given the prevalence of academic anxiety in adolescents, this study examines the role of family functioning as mediated by emotional stability and social support. It aims to provide practitioners with effective intervention strategies. Patients and Methods: This study conducted a questionnaire survey among 456 college students to assess their family functioning, social support, emotional stability, and academic anxiety. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. Results: The findings revealed significant negative correlations between family functioning, emotional stability, social support, and academic anxiety. After controlling for demographic variables, emotional stability and social support were found to play a chain mediating role in the relationship between family functioning and academic anxiety. Conclusion: This study highlights the important role of family functioning in reducing academic anxiety among adolescents, mediated by emotional stability and social support. The findings provide actionable insights for parents and educators to foster a supportive environment that reduces academic stress.

Indexed as

academic anxietyemotional stabilityfamily functioningsocial support

Identifiers

PMID40406340
PMCPMC12094906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.