ArticleJournal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Is Transumbilical Laparoscopic-assisted Appendectomy Better than Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children? A Randomized Controlled Study.
Article in Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical management of pediatric primary splenic lesions: safety and feasibility of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic partial splenectomy.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Practical Benefits of Single- vs. Three-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Pain Relief and Long-Term Cosmesis in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Comparative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To compare the gold standard method of managing acute appendicitis; laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) to transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA). Methods: A randomized clinical study of consecutive pediatric patients (age under 13 years) undergoing appendectomy for noncomplicated acute appendicitis was conducted at a tertiary center in Jordan. Data collected included; perioperative parameters, operative time, gas time, postoperative hospital stay, pathology, complications, pain, and cost. Results: Out of the 50 initially enrolled patients, 47 were included in the analysis (25 in TULAA group [53.2%], 22 in LA group [46.8%]), of which only 12% and 31% of patients had perforated appendicitis, in the TULAA group and LA group consecutively. No early intraoperative complications were observed. Postoperative complications were seen in 4.8% of the LA group and 4% in the TULAA group. TULAA had significantly shorter operative time, lower gas flow, gas time, gas pressure levels, and more cases (68%) were operated without gas use compared to LA. Pain relief, diet resumption, cosmetic, and hospital stay did not significantly differ between the groups. The cosmetic outcome was slightly better in the TULAA group but not statistically significant. Conclusion: TULLA offers an alternative approach to LA for acute appendicitis and may be of benefit in resource-poor institutions whilst maintaining the benefits of the minimally invasive approach. This study has demonstrated a significantly reduced wound infection, operative time, and gaseous insufflation for TULLA compared to LA. Further studies to demonstrate its feasibility in complicated appendicitis may be warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.