Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40406301›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of emergency medicine2025

Development of an emergency department length-of-stay prediction model based on machine learning.

Weiming Wu, Min Li, Huilin Jiang, Min Sun, Yongcheng Zhu, Gongxu Zhu, Yanling Li, Yunmei Li, Junrong Mo, Xiaohui Chen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Weiming Wu1Emergency Department, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China.
Min Li1Emergency Department, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China.
Huilin Jiang1Emergency Department, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China.
Min Sun2Goodwill Hessian Health Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100007, China.
Yongcheng Zhu1Emergency Department, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China.
Gongxu Zhu1Emergency Department, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China.
Yanling Li1Emergency Department, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China.
Yunmei Li1Emergency Department, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China.
Junrong Mo1Emergency Department, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China.
Xiaohui Chen1Emergency Department, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China.
Haifeng Mao1Emergency Department, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe problem of prolonged emergency department length of stay (EDLOS) is becoming increasingly crucial. This study aims to develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict EDLOS, with EDLOS as the outcome variable and demographic characteristics, triage level, and medical resource utilization as predictive factors.

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on the patients who visited the emergency department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from March 2019 to September 2021, and a total of 321,012 cases were identified. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 187,028 cases were finally included in the analysis. ML analysis was performed using R-squared (R

resultsIn the comparative analysis of the six ML models, light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) model demonstrated the lowest MAE (443.519) and RMSE (826.783), and the highest R² value (0.48), indicating better model fit and predictive performance. Among the top 10 predictive factors associated with EDLOS according to the LightGBM model, the emergency waiting time, age, and emergency arrival time had the most significant impact on the EDLOS.

conclusionThe LightGBM model suggests that the emergency waiting time, age, and emergency arrival time may be used to predict the EDLOS.

Indexed as

Emergency departmentLength of stayLight gradient boosting machineMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40406301
PMCPMC12093424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.