ArticleMaternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)2024
Deep Learning in Predicting Preterm Birth: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms.
Article in Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning to predict adverse perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Cervical Insufficiency in China (2026 Revision).Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2026Article
- A machine learning-based risk prediction model for early preterm birth: development and prospective validation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative metabolomic profiling reveals distinct metabolic signatures in amniotic fluid and umbilical cord blood between advanced and young maternal age pregnancies.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Development and Future Perspectives of Obstetric Intensive Care Units in China.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2025Article
- KLF4 orchestrates a Ccl2+ fibroblast-mediated inflammatory network driving preterm birth.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether deep learning algorithms are suitable for predicting preterm birth. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at Peking University Third Hospital from January 2018 to June 2023. Birth data were divided into two parts based on the date of delivery: the first part was used for model training and validation, while real world viability was evaluated using the second part. Four machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and transformer) were employed to predict preterm birth. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated. Results: This research included data on 30,965 births, where 24,770 comprised the first part, and included 3164 (12.77%) in the preterm birth group, with 6195 in the second part, including 795 (12.83%) in the preterm birth group. Significant differences in various factors were observed between the preterm and full-term birth groups. The transformer model (AUC = 79.20%, sensitivity = 73.67%, specificity = 72.48%, PPV = 28.21%, NPV = 94.95%, and accuracy = 72.61% in the test dataset) demonstrated superior performance relative to logistic regression (AUC = 77.96% in the test dataset), support vector machine (AUC = 71.70% in the test dataset), and random forest (AUC = 75.09% in the test dataset) approaches. Conclusion: This study highlights the promise of deep learning algorithms, specifically the transformer algorithm, for predicting preterm birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.