Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40406277›Full record

ArticleMaternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)2024

Deep Learning in Predicting Preterm Birth: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms.

Fangchao Zhang, Lingling Tong, Chen Shi, Rui Zuo, Liwei Wang, Yan Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Development and Future Perspectives of Obstetric Intensive Care Units in China.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fangchao ZhangDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Lingling TongDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang 050010, China.
Chen ShiSchool of Intelligence Science and Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Rui ZuoInformation Management and Big Data Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Liwei WangSchool of Intelligence Science and Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Yan WangDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether deep learning algorithms are suitable for predicting preterm birth. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at Peking University Third Hospital from January 2018 to June 2023. Birth data were divided into two parts based on the date of delivery: the first part was used for model training and validation, while real world viability was evaluated using the second part. Four machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and transformer) were employed to predict preterm birth. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated. Results: This research included data on 30,965 births, where 24,770 comprised the first part, and included 3164 (12.77%) in the preterm birth group, with 6195 in the second part, including 795 (12.83%) in the preterm birth group. Significant differences in various factors were observed between the preterm and full-term birth groups. The transformer model (AUC = 79.20%, sensitivity = 73.67%, specificity = 72.48%, PPV = 28.21%, NPV = 94.95%, and accuracy = 72.61% in the test dataset) demonstrated superior performance relative to logistic regression (AUC = 77.96% in the test dataset), support vector machine (AUC = 71.70% in the test dataset), and random forest (AUC = 75.09% in the test dataset) approaches. Conclusion: This study highlights the promise of deep learning algorithms, specifically the transformer algorithm, for predicting preterm birth.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceMachine learningPreterm birthTransformer

Identifiers

PMID40406277
PMCPMC12087897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.