ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Impact of secondary hematologic malignancies on prognosis of Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Second primary cancers following hematologic malignancies: Epidemiology, pathobiology and clinical management.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study is to report the differences in the prognosis of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) survivors with or without secondary hematologic malignancies (SHM). Methods: This study included patients diagnosed with HL in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching was used to balance the baseline differences between SHM and non-SHM patient groups, while survival analysis was used to compare the overall survival and long-term prognosis differences between the two groups. Results: A total of 36497 patients, along with 231 matched pairs, were included in the study, with a median follow-up time of eight years. The pre-matching multivariate Cox regression results showed that the non-SHM group had a 69% higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to the SHM group. The pre-matching Landmark method revealed no difference in survival between the two groups at < 30 months; at ≥ 30 months, the mortality risk in the SHM group was higher than that in the non-SHM group (HR = 5.188, 95% CI: 3.510, 7.667, P < 0.05). After matching, the Landmark method showed that at < 50 months, the mortality risk of the SHM group was lower than that of the non-SHM group (HR = 0.629, 95% CI: 0.434, 0.935, P<0.05). At ≥ 50 months, the mortality risk of the SHM group was higher than that of the non-SHM group (HR = 3.759, 95% CI: 2.667, 5.300, P < 0.05). Conclusion: The presence of SHM significantly increases the long-term mortality risk in Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.