ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Comprehensive analysis of potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of Cervical squamous cell carcinoma - based on GEO and TCGA databases.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CESC) constitutes a substantial global health burden, especially in resource-limited regions. The identification of reliable biomarkers is critical for developing a clinically applicable nomogram to predict survival outcomes and evaluate immune infiltration in CESC patients. Methods: This study integrated RNA-seq data from GEO and TCGA databases to identify key genes associated with CESC through differential expression analysis and machine learning techniques. Prognostic models were constructed and validated, with additional analyses exploring immune cell infiltration and gene function via GSEA and clinical correlation. Finally, key genes were validated via qRT-PCR in CESC tissues. Results: A total of 112 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified through differential analysis of the GEO and TCGA datasets. Conclusion:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.