ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Consensus statements from the Hong Kong Urological Association and the Hong Kong Society of Uro-Oncology on the management of muscle-invasive and advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Muscle-invasive and advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) are notorious for their high propensity for recurrence and metastasis. Recent advances in novel medications, surgical procedures, and radiotherapy techniques have substantially transformed the treatment landscape of muscle-invasive and advanced UC. It is crucial to navigate the optimal management approaches for muscle-invasive and advanced UC through the increasingly complex matrix of variables. Methods: Two professional organisations convened a consensus panel of six urologists and six clinical oncologists with extensive experience in treating urological malignancies. They reviewed the literature on the management of i) non-metastatic, muscle-invasive, and locally advanced UC of the bladder; ii) locally advanced upper tract UC (UTUC); and iii) unresectable locally advanced or metastatic UC (mUC). The panel held multiple meetings to discuss and draft consensus statements using the modified Delphi method. Each drafted statement was anonymously voted on by every panellist. A consensus statement was accepted if ≥ 80% of the panellists chose 'accept completely' or 'accept with some reservation' from the five options, which also included 'accept with major reservation', 'reject with reservation', and 'reject completely'. Results: The panel reached a consensus on 63 statements based on current evidence and expert insights. These statements addressed the considerations for different treatment modalities, including surgical approaches, radiotherapy, radiosensitisers, platinum-based chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates, in the management of different disease entities, including muscle-invasive UC of the bladder, cN1 disease, locally advanced UTUC, unresectable locally advanced/mUC, and oligometastatic bladder cancer. Conclusion: These consensus statements are anticipated to serve as a practical recommendation for clinicians in Hong Kong, and possibly the Asia-Pacific region, regarding the management of muscle-invasive and advanced UC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.