ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2025
Incidence of opportunities for improvement in trauma patient care: a retrospective registry-based study.
Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical outcomes and opportunities for improvement across modified trauma quality improvement cohorts: a registry-based cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Audit filters: beyond linear assumption.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Article
- Beyond mortality: what a 30,000-foot view of opportunities for improvement can teach us about trauma center maturity.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Trauma is a leading cause of death in individuals aged 45 and younger, contributing significantly to the global disease burden. Local trauma quality improvement programs have been implemented to improve clinical practice and patient outcomes. Multidisciplinary peer reviews, included in quality improvement programs, aim to identify opportunities for improvement in trauma patient care and implement corrective measures. This study assesses the incidence and trends of these opportunities across clinically important trauma cohorts. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the trauma registry at Karolinska University Hospital in Solna, Sweden, between 2017 and 2022. Patients screened for opportunities for improvement were categorized into common trauma cohorts. Logistic regression was used to analyze trends in the occurrence of opportunities for improvement over the years in each cohort. The relationship between opportunities for improvement and trauma cohorts was also assessed. Results: Out of 7192 patients included, 404 (6%) had at least one opportunity for improvement. A statistically significant decrease in opportunities for improvement per year was observed overall (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.84 to 0.95). Significant decreases were identified in patients with blunt multisystem trauma without traumatic brain injury (TBI) (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.93), isolated severe TBI (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.91), and severe penetrating injuries (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.50 to 0.92). The blunt multisystem with TBI cohort showed a non-significant increase. After adjusting for Injury Severity Score, only the blunt multisystem without TBI cohort remained significantly associated with opportunities for improvement (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.24 to 2.31). Conclusion: The incidence of opportunities for improvement in trauma care showed a significant decrease, indicating that the current trauma quality improvement program at Karolinska University Hospital may be effective in reducing opportunities for improvement. Patients with blunt multisystem trauma without TBI were at higher risk for opportunities for improvement compared with other trauma cohorts. Level of evidence: Level IV: retrospective study with up to three negative criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.