Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40406234›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2025

Incidence of opportunities for improvement in trauma patient care: a retrospective registry-based study.

Kelvin Szolnoky, Elias Joneborg, Jonatan Attergrim, Hussein Albaaj, Lovisa Strömmer, Olof Brattström, Martin Jacobsson, Martin Gerdin Wärnberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Audit filters: beyond linear assumption.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kelvin SzolnokyDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0554-1872
Elias JoneborgDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jonatan AttergrimDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9546-5788
Hussein AlbaajDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lovisa StrömmerDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Olof BrattströmDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mora Hospital, Mora, Sweden.
Martin JacobssonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin Gerdin WärnbergDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6069-4794

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Trauma is a leading cause of death in individuals aged 45 and younger, contributing significantly to the global disease burden. Local trauma quality improvement programs have been implemented to improve clinical practice and patient outcomes. Multidisciplinary peer reviews, included in quality improvement programs, aim to identify opportunities for improvement in trauma patient care and implement corrective measures. This study assesses the incidence and trends of these opportunities across clinically important trauma cohorts. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the trauma registry at Karolinska University Hospital in Solna, Sweden, between 2017 and 2022. Patients screened for opportunities for improvement were categorized into common trauma cohorts. Logistic regression was used to analyze trends in the occurrence of opportunities for improvement over the years in each cohort. The relationship between opportunities for improvement and trauma cohorts was also assessed. Results: Out of 7192 patients included, 404 (6%) had at least one opportunity for improvement. A statistically significant decrease in opportunities for improvement per year was observed overall (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.84 to 0.95). Significant decreases were identified in patients with blunt multisystem trauma without traumatic brain injury (TBI) (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.93), isolated severe TBI (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.91), and severe penetrating injuries (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.50 to 0.92). The blunt multisystem with TBI cohort showed a non-significant increase. After adjusting for Injury Severity Score, only the blunt multisystem without TBI cohort remained significantly associated with opportunities for improvement (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.24 to 2.31). Conclusion: The incidence of opportunities for improvement in trauma care showed a significant decrease, indicating that the current trauma quality improvement program at Karolinska University Hospital may be effective in reducing opportunities for improvement. Patients with blunt multisystem trauma without TBI were at higher risk for opportunities for improvement compared with other trauma cohorts. Level of evidence: Level IV: retrospective study with up to three negative criteria.

Indexed as

quality improvement

Identifiers

PMID40406234
PMCPMC12096987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.