ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
A complex adaptive systems model of labour reciprocity and normative reasoning in swidden agriculture.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A complex adaptive systems model of labour reciprocity and normative reasoning in swidden agriculture.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Swidden (aka 'slash-and-burn') agriculture is a prototypical-coupled human and natural system. Despite this, mathematical models integrating its social and ecological dynamics are rare. Here, we use complex adaptive systems theory to develop a model where individuals rely on labour exchange driven by reciprocity and normative reasoning that can lead to sanctions. Our results identify three emergent regimes: low-intensity swidden, sustainable high-intensity swidden that maximizes ecosystem services and harvest returns, and deforestation. We show that sustainable high-intensity swidden evolves if labour reciprocity and normative reasoning are balanced: helping behaviour should be significantly conditioned by normative reasoning to prevent over-harvesting, while reciprocity is necessary to prevent excessive sanctioning. We find that the sustainable high-intensity swidden regime is robust to changes in group size, is resilient to environmental shocks, can evolve under various models of forest ecology and is most productive for both forests and farmers when the balance of labour reciprocity and normative reasoning results in an intermediate scale of forest disturbance. Overall, we illuminate the importance of Indigenous social norms and customary practices related to swidden labour in maintaining sustainable and intensive swidden agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.