ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Hazards of lunar surface exploration: determining the immunogenicity/allergenicity of lunar dust.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [Mechanisms and protective strategies for astronaut skin injury in deep space environments].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025Pooled it
- A biological and ethical assessment of whether humans could or should reproduce in space.NPJ microgravity · 2025Review
- [Effects of lunar soil simulant and Earth soil on lung injury in mice].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although infrequent, there have been Apollo program reports of lunar dust exposure leading to notable upper respiratory symptoms in select crewmembers. Possible mechanisms include particulate irritation, inflammation from toxic insult, or legitimate adaptive immune-mediated response. Although sterile non-protein matter would not be expected to be immunogenic, one Apollo flight surgeon reported increasing symptoms upon repeated perceived exposure with associated eosinophilia, suggestive of possible allergic reactions. Many International Space Station (ISS) crews display a pattern of persistent immune system dysregulation and latent virus reactivation. Some ISS crews manifest atypical respiratory and/or dermatitis symptoms which could have an allergic component. It is logical to anticipate crew immune dysregulation could worsen during prolonged deep space missions and planetary surface hazards will only complicate crew health risks. Allergic (i.e. mast cell-mediated) reactivity could adversely increase negative clinical and operational impacts for long-duration lunar astronauts and affect countermeasure requirements for surface vehicles. This study investigated whether lunar dust exposure could possibly elicit an IgE mediated allergic response during spaceflight by utilizing in vitro cell culture models. Our laboratory was officially approved for receipt of actual lunar dust samples from the Apollo 16 mission from NASA. These samples were used to complete the proposed set of in vitro cell culture experiments, using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from healthy individuals, and basophils and eosinophil cell lines. Cells were co-cultured with cellular mitogens, common recall antigens (Der p1), fine ground silica quartz (control), or lunar dust, to study whether lunar dust exposure could alter the generation of selective immune responses associated with clinical allergic reactions. Measured outputs included supernatant-derived total IgE, tryptase, histamine, and selected cytokine levels. Cellular activation was monitored by assessing activation markers via flow cytometry. EM/x-ray analysis was used to determine cellular interactions with dust particles. The assessments in primary human blood immune cells indicated no evidence for cellular responsiveness nor 'allergy-like' reactivity to lunar dust. Assessments using purified 'allergic' cell lines, did yield some unique but mild responsiveness to lunar dust, however such cells lines can have response profiles somewhat different from their in vivo counterparts. This study determining the allergy specific immune responses, will help guide NASA to develop mitigation techniques and potential countermeasures necessary in the event of excessive exposure to lunar dust during lunar surface EVAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.