ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
A scoping review of arts in mental health policy in the United States.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mental health crisis in the United States has been exacerbated with the emergence of the loneliness epidemic and resurgence of mental health inequities. To address the scope of this crisis comprehensively and equitably, a socioecological, cross-sectoral approach is necessary. While arts in mental health strategies have been employed internationally and nationally for preventative and rehabilitative mental health support, there remains limited knowledge of policy in the US to sustain and expand arts in mental health practices. Subsequently, this review sought to understand what priorities and strategies are employed in public health policies that seek to engage the arts to address mental health in the United States. Fourteen databases - inclusive of Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and PolicyFile - were searched alongside a comprehensive grey literature search. Included documents were originated by a US organization or agency, included a mode and form of arts participation, had a focus on mental health, maintained a public health purview, pertain to the United States, and can be considered a policy document. Of 4,958 identified documents, 29 met inclusion criteria and were included. Following extraction, the evidence revealed several salient results: (a) the relative nascency of arts in mental health policy documents in the United States; (b) that policy recommendations primarily center on creating sustained, collective action and leveraging funding; and (c) that the arts sector alongside the arts and health sector are primarily leading policy work. Current momentum in the United States offers a "policy window" as there is alignment, as evidenced in this review, amongst national policy makers, the prevailing mental health crisis, and opportunities for arts in mental health policies as a viable solution. As such, this work can be mobilized to strategize how to best engage or promote the engagement of local artists, mental health practitioners, arts in mental health researchers, and policy makers in the development of arts in mental health policies moving forward. Future work should seek to intentionally build on areas of sustained effort to effectively catalyze future work towards developing legislative, regulative, or even litigative cross-sectoral, arts in mental health policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.