Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40406058›Full record

ReviewSleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society2025

Scoping review of the measurement of care environment factors that impact sleep in the rehabilitation, subacute, and aged care settings.

Olivia B Ogilvy Dunstan, Leila Shafiee Hanjani, Francisca Rodriguez, Veronica Garcia-Hansen, Ruth E Hubbard, Adrienne Young, Claire M Ellender

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Olivia B Ogilvy DunstanCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0470-6719
Leila Shafiee HanjaniCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7088-9739
Francisca RodriguezSchool of Architecture and Built Environment, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9177-1991
Veronica Garcia-HansenSchool of Architecture and Built Environment, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5934-5554
Ruth E HubbardCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8688-5836
Adrienne YoungCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4498-4342
Claire M EllenderDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1727-576X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study Objectives: Unfamiliar environments are often poorly conducive to quality sleep, especially for patients within health and aged care settings. This scoping review aims to map available evidence regarding the sleep environment in rehabilitation, subacute, and aged care settings. It examines how these factors are measured and seeks to identify any reported standard metrics, guidelines, or methodologies. Methods: Searches were conducted within PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, and Web of Science from database inception to May 2023. Eligibility criteria included original studies of any design reporting on the measurement properties of care environment factors affecting the sleep of adult patients admitted to rehabilitation, subacute wards, and aged care facilities. Results: Seventy-four studies were reviewed that included 5055 participants, mostly (78.4%, 58/74) from aged care facilities. From 102 identified care environment factors, the spectral measurements of light were most reported (65.7%, 67/102), with methodologies varying from actigraphy and illuminance meters to pendant-style light monitors. Other environmental factors (sound, temperature, and air quality/humidity), room characteristics (mattress/bedding, room cohabitation), and hospital functioning (imposed schedules) were measured considerably less often and displayed similar variations in reported units and devices. Eighteen studies reported international, national, and methodological standards or guidelines. Conclusions: This review provides a comprehensive overview of the care environment factors affecting sleep studied within rehabilitation, subacute, and aged care settings. Various units and devices were used in measuring these factors, and standard metrics and methodology were not consistently used. Future care environment studies incorporating interventions that employ standardized devices, units, and methodologies, will thereby enhance the reliability and comparability of findings within this field.

Indexed as

aged careenvironment controlledenvironment designlong-term carenoisenursing homespatient roomsrehabilitationreproducibility of resultssleep

Identifiers

PMID40406058
PMCPMC12096297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.