ReviewJB & JS open access
The Value of Research in the Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Applicant: A Pilot Survey of Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Program Directors.
Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The role of research in the orthopaedic surgery residency application process has become increasingly important, particularly in the wake of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 examination transitioning to pass/fail. The purpose of this study was to determine the value that orthopaedic surgery residency program directors and other faculty place on various research elements included in residency applications. Methods: An anonymous cross-sectional survey was distributed to program directors and other faculty involved with the review of orthopaedic surgery residency applications within the Collaborative of Orthopaedic Education Research Group in February 2024. The survey asked questions related to the value placed on publication types, authorship position, dedicated research years, and the general importance of research. Results: Ten respondents, including 7 program directors, 2 assistant program directors, and 1 director of research, participated. Eight (80%) indicated that the number of publications is important, with 4 (40%) identifying a minimum number of publications of 2 to 3 to be considered competitive at their program. Respondents also identified the following components as important: journal impact factor (9; 90%), authorship position (5; 50%), and study type (7; 70%). Clinical research within orthopaedic surgery was most highly regarded (9; 90%), while case studies were deemed least valuable (9; 90%). Six respondents (60%) agreed that research is more important now that USMLE Step 1 is pass/fail. Conclusions: Since the transition of Step 1 to pass/fail, research has become an increasingly important part of an orthopaedic surgery resident's application. Residency programs value research productivity, particularly clinical research within orthopaedics. While the minimum number of publications varies, 2 to 3 are often considered competitive. Factors contributing to the perceived value of research include journal impact factor, authorship position, and study type. With this knowledge, applicants can align their research activities with the values of orthopaedic surgery residency programs. Level of Evidence: Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.