ArticleGland surgery2025
Development and validation of a multivariable risk model based on clinicopathological characteristics, mammography, and MRI imaging features for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with upgraded ductal carcinoma
Article in Gland surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- MRI-based radiomics with SHAP interpretation for preoperative prediction of upstaging in ductal carcinomaTranslational cancer research · 2026Article
- Construction of a prediction model for axillary lymph node metastasis in stage cN0 hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: based on interpretable machine learning methods.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Construction of a prediction model for axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients based on a multimodal fusion strategy of ultrasound and pathological images.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Intra-tumor and peritumoral radiomics and deep learning based on ultrasound for differentiating fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumor: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Axillary surgical staging is required for patients with upgraded ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (DCIS is diagnosed on core biopsy with invasive cancer found on pathology after complete surgical excision), which may lead to complications in axillary surgery. At present, there is no reliable and accurate method for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in patients with upgraded DCIS; however, such a method could prevent unnecessary axillary surgical interventions from being performed. In this study, we aimed to construct a non-invasive model for predicting ALNM in DCIS patients based on clinicopathological characteristics, mammography (MG) features, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features. Methods: Between February 2018 and June 2020, 326 patients with upgraded DCIS were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. These patients were randomly divided into the training cohort (80%) and validation cohort (20%). Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were conducted to identify the candidate pathological features, which then used to develop a clinicopathological model. The features of the 2-mm, 4-mm, and 6-mm intratumoral and peritumoral regions (T-PTR) were extracted to develop the MRI radiomics model, and two deep learning classification models were developed based on the medial-lateral oblique (MLO) and craniocaudal (CC) views of the MG. A fusion model was then established that combined these sub-models. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the curve (AUC), and other indicators were used to evaluate the performance of these models. Results: The clinicopathological characteristics of the two cohorts were basically balanced. The AUC values of the clinicopathological model were 0.675 and 0.690 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The model based on the T-PTR of MRI showed promising predictive ability. Among the three MRI models, the T-PTR (4 mm) model showed the best predictivity both in the training (AUC =0.885) and validation cohorts (AUC =0.843). The AUC values for the deep learning models of the MG CC and MLO positions all exceeded 0.7, indicating reliable predictive performance. The fusion model that combined the three methods significantly improved the accuracy and robustness of ALNM prediction. In both the training (AUC =0.975) and validation (AUC =0.877) cohorts, the fusion model showed excellent performance. Conclusions: We developed a fusion model that combined clinicopathological characteristics, MRI T-PTR (4 mm) radiomics, and MG-based deep learning. Our combined model showed promising performance in predicting ALNM in patients with upgraded DCIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.