Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40405955›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2025

Recent changes in surgical outcomes and preoperative biliary drainage with the increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: a single-center retrospective study.

Naoya Imamura, Atsushi Nanashima, Yuki Tsuchimochi, Takeomi Hamada, Hiroshi Kawakami, Masahide Hiyoshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Naoya ImamuraDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8358-5328
Atsushi NanashimaDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan.
Yuki TsuchimochiDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan.
Takeomi HamadaDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan.
Hiroshi KawakamiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan.
Masahide HiyoshiDepartment of Surgery, Miyazaki Medical Association hospital, Miyazaki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been increasingly used in recent years in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This has forced a change in the practice of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) is performed in PDAC patients scheduled for pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). What has changed in the NAC era and what is the appropriate method of PBD? To address this question, this study retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcomes and details of PBD in NAC and upfront surgery (US) patients. Methods: The study included consecutive PDAC patients who underwent PD from 2013 to 2021 during the transition from US to NAC, when outcomes were comparable. Clinical factors such as patient background, preoperative examination, surgical procedure, and postoperative complications were compared between the NAC group (40 patients) and the US group (59 patients), and details of PBD such as PBD procedure and adverse events were compared between the NAC and US groups who received PBD (27 NAC patients, 33 US patients). In the comparison test between groups, Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney Results: There were no differences in patient background between the NAC and US groups. Compared with the US group, the NAC group had higher preoperative albumin (ALB) levels and less blood loss, but there was no difference of postoperative complications (NAC Conclusions: Prolonged PBD with NAC did not adversely affect surgical outcomes. MS placement provides a long patency period and is currently useful in PBD for PDAC patients undergoing PD after NAC, which requires a prolonged preoperative period. However, MS placement also has adverse events, and further studies are needed.

Indexed as

neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)pancreatic cancerpancreatoduodenectomy (PD)Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD)

Identifiers

PMID40405955
PMCPMC12093172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.