Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40405948›Full record

ReviewGland surgery2025

Liquid biopsy in breast cancer: a practical guide for surgeons.

Janhavi Venkataraman, Timothy Crook, Kefah Mokbel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gland surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Could circulating tumor cells explain why breast conservation improves survival despite higher locoregional recurrence?Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Janhavi VenkataramanThe London Breast Institute, Princess Grace Hospital, HCA Healthcare pvt Ltd., London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4924-6680
Timothy CrookThe London Breast Institute, Princess Grace Hospital, HCA Healthcare pvt Ltd., London, UK.
Kefah MokbelThe London Breast Institute, Princess Grace Hospital, HCA Healthcare pvt Ltd., London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer remains a global health challenge, requiring innovative strategies for early detection, diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and recurrence detection. Liquid biopsy-leveraging circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), microRNAs (miRNAs), exosomes, immune-based biomarkers, and tumor-educated platelets (TEPs)-has emerged as a promising tool to address these needs. CTCs and ctDNA provide critical insights into tumor heterogeneity, therapeutic targets, and resistance mechanisms, while miRNAs, exosomes, and other non-CTC-based markers reflect the tumor microenvironment and offer potential biomarkers for disease progression. Importantly, liquid biopsy offers distinct advantages in early detection and precise diagnosis, as well as in identifying therapeutic resistance in real time, allowing clinicians to adapt treatment strategies effectively. The non-invasive nature of liquid biopsy further enables real-time tumor monitoring, paving the way for personalized treatment approaches. However, several challenges hinder its routine clinical adoption, including technical complexity, economic constraints, and variations in detection sensitivity due to low biomarker abundance. Additionally, a lack of standardization in methodology and interpretation limits its widespread application. Rigorous standardization and clinical validation are essential to address these barriers, ensuring equitable access across diverse healthcare settings and transforming breast cancer care for millions worldwide. Future directions include integrating artificial intelligence and multi-omic approaches to enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility.

Indexed as

circulating tumor cells (CTCs)circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)exosomesLiquid biopsymicroRNAs (miRNAs)

Identifiers

PMID40405948
PMCPMC12093179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.